John, No I am asking that first two lines of the explanation for /timing in the HELP had to have almost all the essential information needed
- how to apply /timing (trivial) and
- where to look for the outcome of /timing.
I do not have time for try and faults to find that myself and have no interest to read two pages how it works because intuitively all is clear without this. Fun though was that after finally reading those two pages i found no answer on my question 2) which made me remembering Landau. 😃
Remember I wrote that I am always losing my keys, wallet, glasses and cellphone? I spent time to really realize this phenomenon. The answer is that all my life I lived on my good short memory. With aging, and with added with years stress i became more scatter-minded. In such cases everyone losing control of hands and the memory becomes more and more professional oriented and stops caring about small unimportant things like what is in your hands. Hands start living their own life 😃
After teaching myself to place these things strictly on one-two places only (i remembered that granddad tried to teach me to keep everything in order but i did not care much) i do not have any problems anymore. Things are that there are almost infinite amount of places to displace your stuff.
Same with new things and bad not-intuitive documentation. There exist infinite amount of possibilities for implementation of /timing so you do not proceed at all if it was not answered exactly. The keyword here is 'exactly'. Documentation has to show exactly how thing were done first laconic standard way, and then verbose way.