View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2025 2:25 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
After setting screen size to 200 in win11, getting an error in sdbg as follows:
%TY must immediately follow %Tx
after quitting with trace, get
"for comprehensive error report, must have a FTN95 license
from Silver Frost " ????
Help, Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2025 2:03 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Note: Has anybody seen this message and please respond, Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Sid
I can't get that happen, I have Win 11 24H2 with a high-resolution screen set to 200% (which, incidentally, is a big improvement on the 175% it was set to so I might keep it like that). sdbg is working okay for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:09 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Still getting this error, would it possibly be eliminated by downloading the latest version of Silverfrost Fortran and what site has it? Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 2:40 am Post subject: Display |
|
|
Downloaded and installed the latest version of Silverfrost Fortran. Re-compiled my program again and re-built. When I tried to execute sdbg, got the same error shown, has to do with ClearWin+ as this is what is displayed as the source command? Really confused as to why I am getting this error and no one else is. I do not have any commands that say "ClearWin+" so not sure where it is coming from. Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2025 2:11 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Not sure that I am downloading the latest copy of Silverfrost Fortran, still getting this error from Clearwin+ Not sure if it is a windows error or Silverfrost, any help here? Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2025 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you sure the correct salflibc.dll is available to sdbg? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 2:24 am Post subject: Display |
|
|
Hi Robert, not sure what correct version of salflibc.dll is nor where it would be. When I downloaded the Silverfrost fortran I assumed that it would be downloaded with the silverfrost fortran fiiles, how can I confirm and where would I locate the correct version of Silverfrost fortran to replace what I have? Sid kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Check that the sdbg.exe and salflibc.dll are about the same age and in the same folder.
If you change your screen to be 100% -- does the problem go away? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 2:07 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Yes., when resolution 175% or 100% ok, only get error when resolution > 175% |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2025 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have tried mine up to 250% (and 225%) and it works without an issue. I am not sure what to suggest. Is sdbg64 the same? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2025 10:01 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Robert: This is definitely a ClearWin+ error, not sure how to fix. Have tried compiling with the 64 bit code and the Win32 code, still getting the error when I have the display resolution set greater than 175, very confused. Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:02 am Post subject: Display |
|
|
Interesting: I only get this error on my laptop computer as it allows greater than 175 resolution. However, on my desk top computer it only allows a mx of 175 resolution? Sid kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2910 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2025 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Took my 13.3" laptop with Win10 and FTN9.03 and very high for this screen size native resolution 3200x1800, which is almost impossible to use without fonts enlargement, made enlargement 200 and got no problem debugging. Same with 250 and 300. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|