| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 2923
Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:10 am Post subject: DRAW_LINE@ and DRAW_TEXT@ |
 |
|
Paul
Any reasons why simple and clear DRAW_LINE@ and DRAW_TEXT@ were substituted (not supported in 64bits) with longer names DRAW_LINE_BETWEEN@ and DRAW_CHARACTERS@ ?
They do the same things. How about just to support both like alias of each other? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PaulLaidler
Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 8210
Location: Salford, UK
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dan
These are very old DBOS names. They are hard-wired into salflibc.dll. Since they are old and there lots of them, they are not provided as aliases in clearwin64.dll.
If you prefer to continue using these old names then you should add the line
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler
Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 8210
Location: Salford, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
John
This information is already in the document noteson64bitftn95.txt and also in ftn95.chm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
