View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
FK_GER
Joined: 26 Oct 2017 Posts: 35 Location: University of Kassel,Germany
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 3:10 pm Post subject: Inconsistency at drawing part 2 |
|
|
Another problem!
Please have a look on the two draws, especially on the blue dash-dot-dot-lines.
Both are done with the same program, only an other example.
The upper draw is correct. But in the lower draw some blue dash-dot-dot-lines are done falsely. Why??
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 8210 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Again I would need to have the code and the data in order to comment.
It is interesting that you are able to do so much with %pl which started out as a basic graph plotting feature. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FK_GER
Joined: 26 Oct 2017 Posts: 35 Location: University of Kassel,Germany
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello to all,
I must contradict, that the code has a bug. As said before, both examples are done with same program exactly. A difference exists only in the scaling of the plots, which is chosen by the program dependent on the heigth and and the width of the considered example.
It's incomprehensibly, why at the lower plot the first 4 lines are done correctly and the following lines don't. If there is a bug in the code, all lines must be plotted in the same way.
Here the code for plot-settngs in both cases:
Code: | CALL winop@("%pl[width=2]")
CALL winop@("%pl[pen_style=4]")
CALL winop@("%pl[link=lines]")
CALL winop@("%pl[Colour=blue]")
CALL winop@("%pl[symbol_size=3]")
CALL winop@("%pl[symbol=7]")
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|