 |
forums.silverfrost.com Welcome to the Silverfrost forums
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in| Search found 7757 matches |
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Topic: Different behavior concerning READF@ |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 2 Views: 32 |
 Forum: 64-bit Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:24 am Subject: |
| dgurok
Can you post or send me a sample program that illustrates the difference? |
|
| Topic: False warning messages with /64 for a test file |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 3 Views: 122 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2023 8:17 am Subject: |
| John
I expect there will be a Forum update to v9.01. |
|
| Topic: False warning messages with /64 for a test file |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 3 Views: 122 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2023 2:41 pm Subject: |
| mecej4
Thank you for the feeback. This false warning has now been removed for the next release of FTN95 (i.e. after v9.00). |
|
| Topic: Porting old DBOS calls |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 10 Views: 391 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2023 1:31 pm Subject: |
| Ryan
They all need a terminating @ (or sometimes $) for ClearWin+. |
|
| Topic: Porting old DBOS calls |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 10 Views: 391 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:03 pm Subject: |
| Ryan
There seems to be a conflict with simdem64.dll and I presume that you are not using simdem. To fix this, go to your FTN95.exe folder (usually C:\Program Files (x86)\Silverfrost\FTN95) and r ... |
|
| Topic: Porting old DBOS calls |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 10 Views: 391 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2023 8:30 am Subject: |
| Ryan
SET_COLOURS@ is available via INCLUDE <clearwin.ins> or USE clrwin. It sets the colours for the VGA palette. Otherwise a default palette is used. For %gr, the ClearWin+ library now us ... |
|
| Topic: Porting old DBOS calls |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 10 Views: 391 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 3:06 pm Subject: |
| The FTN95 help file FTN95.chm has a section ClearWin+ -> Functions ported from DBOS -> Table of alternative routines.
This says, for example, use DRAW_ELLIPSE@ for ELLIPSE@ etc.. |
|
| Topic: How split 8bytes number into two 4-bytes and combine back |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 12 Views: 1598 |
Forum: General Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2023 8:48 am Subject: |
| integer,parameter::k=selected_int_kind(18)
integer(k)::v,U,L v = 22222222222_k U = ishft(v, -32) L = iand(v, Z'00000000ffffffff'_k) v = ior ... |
|
| Topic: Lbound with derived-type arrays |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 13 Views: 7176 |
Forum: Support Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 3:40 pm Subject: |
| This failure has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95. | |
| Topic: Attempt to emit 32-bit instruction in /64 mode |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 1 Views: 341 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 1:20 pm Subject: |
| Ryan
We are willing to look at bugs for 64 bit SCC but at the moment we may not always aim to provide a fix. I will send you a private message. Paul |
|
| Topic: Compiler issues strange error message for correct code |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 6 Views: 1088 |
Forum: Support Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 10:05 am Subject: |
| This failure has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95.
I guess that the reason this failure has only now become apparent is that it seems natural to only use a renamed variable within the c ... |
|
| Topic: How split 8bytes number into two 4-bytes and combine back |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 12 Views: 1598 |
Forum: General Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2023 4:13 pm Subject: |
| All Fortran integers are signed, so for INTEGER*4 values greater than 2147483647, U and L must be changed to INTEGER*8.
integer,parameter::k=4 integer(k)::v,U,L v = 222 ... |
|
| Topic: first time user of %PL |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 15 Views: 1539 |
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2023 8:34 am Subject: |
| John
The native %pl was introduced because SIMPLEPLOT is a third party 32 bit library. So the development was motivated by the move to 64 bits. But the native %pl soon had more options that work eq ... |
|
| Topic: Failure to detect undefined variable in a common block |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 3 Views: 1309 |
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:41 am Subject: |
| mecej4
It turns out that /UNDEF has not been implemented for BLOCK DATA and 64 bit programming. This was presumably because of the complexities of handling this for 64 bits and the understanding th ... |
|
| Topic: first time user of %PL |
|
| PaulLaidler Replies: 15 Views: 1539 |
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 8:19 am Subject: |
| John
The %pl "native" options are also available for 32 bit programming. |
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group