False warning messages with /64 for a test file

The file https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L1KBWyuoeKUBpiR94i6m3LmUsKu1fJWz/view?usp=sharing is a cleaned-up version of file acdcc.f in the BVPTest package that may be downloaded from https://archimede.uniba.it/~bvpsolvers/testsetbvpsolvers/?page_id=27 .

Without /64, using the FTN95 8.97 compiler, the test file compiles with no warnings or errors. With /64, however, a number of spurious warnings are issued:

S:\ALGO\ODE\BVPTest\bvpTestSet\fortransrc\drivers>ftn95 /64 buggy.f
[FTN95/x64 Ver. 8.97.2 Copyright (c) Silverfrost Ltd 1993-2023]
    NO ERRORS  [<ACDCCD> FTN95 v8.97.2]
    NO ERRORS  [<ODEF> FTN95 v8.97.2]
    NO ERRORS  [<ODEJAC> FTN95 v8.97.2]
    NO ERRORS  [<GSUB> FTN95 v8.97.2]
    NO ERRORS  [<DGSUB> FTN95 v8.97.2]
    NO ERRORS  [<FNUMJAC> FTN95 v8.97.2]
    NO ERRORS  [<BCNUMJAC> FTN95 v8.97.2]
WARNING S:\ALGO\ODE\BVPTest\bvpTestSet\fortransrc\drivers\buggy.F 505:  In a call to APPREFSOL from another procedure, the sixth argument was of type REAL(KIND=2), it is now REAL(KIND=2)
WARNING S:\ALGO\ODE\BVPTest\bvpTestSet\fortransrc\drivers\buggy.F 505:  In a call to APPREFSOL from another procedure, the seventh argument was of type REAL(KIND=2), it is now REAL(KIND=2)
WARNING S:\ALGO\ODE\BVPTest\bvpTestSet\fortransrc\drivers\buggy.F 505:  In a call to APPREFSOL from another procedure, the 13th argument was of type REAL(KIND=2), it is now REAL(KIND=2)
WARNING S:\ALGO\ODE\BVPTest\bvpTestSet\fortransrc\drivers\buggy.F 505:  In a call to APPREFSOL from another procedure, the 15th argument was of type INTEGER(KIND=3), it is now INTEGER(KIND=3)
    NO ERRORS, 4 WARNINGS  [<APPREFSOL> FTN95 v8.97.2]

Note that in each of the four warnings, the 'was' type and the 'now' type are identical!

mecej4

Thank you for the feeback. This false warning has now been removed for the next release of FTN95 (i.e. after v9.00).

I thoughtr this 'incorrect' warning was identified previously, as I have been getting this problem with Versions 8.9+. It is certainly occuring with Ver 8.97.2, although I have forgotten what this intermediate .2 version is !

Will this be version 9.1, or provided in the Support forum ?

John

I expect there will be a Forum update to v9.01.