Dan,
I am moving our discussion about Simpleplot and %pl to a new topic as it seems to me more apropriate, considering the focus of the problems we have being discussing during the last weeks.....thus, taking your last comment from the previous topic:
You know how much time i lost on the bugs of SPlot? Just today 3 hours full voice swearing (was getting exception violations on 10 years old code). And i thought i know all its pitfalls. This POS somehow i still don't understand is sensitive to the data it plots even if it is in the real*4 limits range. How to find the error in this case if source is not available and using debugger is not possible ? If author would at least cleaned the source and got the major bugs out then being eternal betatester of SP would not suck so much
I have to say that I had a different experience....I used Simpleplot with FTN77, FTN90 and FTN95 (both versions, i.e. Salford and Silverfrost) and I do not remember to have had a problem with exception violation....as you know, I practically don't use %pl except as [user_drawn], so that I code always direct calls to Simpleplot subroutines. I wonder if your problems are always with %pl or you found that also calls to Simpleplot gave you exception violations. I think it would be good for the discussion if you could share with us the bugs you found. As you know, I do not consider Simpleplot as a perfect graphical solution for FTN95, but is the only free-one that I found till now. I gave a look at DSLIN and did not find a way to use it with Clearwin, so it was out of discussion for me, and a couple of tests with Simdem did not gave me similar results as Clearwin+Simpleplot: it seemed that Simdem has its proper output, which is nice if you like it, but you cannot configure a Clearwin window as you want. That's the reason I am still with Simpleplot, with all the limitations it still has because is a ...uhmm...10 years old software?.
Agustin

