 |
forums.silverfrost.com
Welcome to the Silverfrost forums
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mecej4
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1899
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2018 5:34 pm Post subject: Incorrect results for sum(vector expression) |
 |
|
FTN95 8.30.279 produces incorrect results or aborts with floating point errors for the following correct code. The value on line-21 was chosen to make the result to be exactly 0.
| Code: | program tfu
implicit none
integer, parameter :: double=kind(0.d0), NX=16
real(double) :: x(NX),F
integer :: i,n
!
n = NX
Do i = 1, n, 4
x(i) = 1.0D0
x(i+1) = 3.0D0
x(i+2) =-1.0D0
x(i+3) = 0.0D0
End Do
print 10,x
F = sum (( x(:n-3:2) + 1.0D1*x(2:n-2:2))**2 &
+ 5.0D0*(x(3:n-1:2) - x(4:n:2))**2 &
+ (x(2:n-2:2) - 2.0D0*x(3:n-1:2))**4 &
+ 1.0D1*(x(:n-3:2) - x(4:n:2))**4) &
- 14195d0
print 20,F
10 format ('X = [',16F5.1,']')
20 format('F = ',F10.1,', expected value = 0.0')
End Program |
The results from various runs:
| Code: |
OPTION RESULT
/check -11040.0
/checkmate -11040.0
- default - Floating point divide by zero
/opt Floating point divide by zero
/64 /check -11040.0
/64 *** AMD backend failure
/64 /opt -16929.0
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnCampbell
Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 2615
Location: Sydney
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
mecej4,
What an example !!
Where did you get this code from ?
What would happen if N is not a multiple of 4 ?
If this is an example of Fortran on WWW they didn't learn Fortran where I did.
I thought I would confirm your results. I am using FTN95 Ver 8.20.0
I also adapted your example to try and understand the implied loops in the array section. | Code: | program tfu
implicit none
integer, parameter :: double=kind(0.d0), NX=16
real(double) :: x(NX),F, Acum
integer :: i,n,k
!
n = NX
Do i = 1, n, 4
x(i) = 1.0D0
x(i+1) = 3.0D0
x(i+2) =-1.0D0
x(i+3) = 0.0D0
End Do
print 10,x
acum = 0
do k = 0,n-4,2
acum = acum &
+ ( x(k+1) + 1.0D1*x(k+2) )**2 &
+ 5.0D0*( x(k+3) - x(k+4) )**2 &
+ ( x(k+2) - 2.0D0*x(k+3) )**4 &
+ 1.0D1*( x(k+1) - x(k+4) )**4
end do
acum = acum - 14195d0
print 30,acum
F = sum (( x(:n-3:2) + 1.0D1*x(2:n-2:2))**2 &
+ 5.0D0*(x(3:n-1:2) - x(4:n:2))**2 &
+ (x(2:n-2:2) - 2.0D0*x(3:n-1:2))**4 &
+ 1.0D1*(x(:n-3:2) - x(4:n:2))**4) &
- 14195d0
print 20,F
10 format ('X = [',16F5.1,']')
20 format ('F = ',F10.1,', expected value = 0.0')
30 format ('A = ',F10.1,', expected value = 0.0')
End Program |
I can confirm that I got the same results as you report.
(acum = 0 in all cases)
In the past, FTN95 has demonstrated errors when the available registers are not sufficient to convert a single statement. This looks like a likely possibility.
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler
Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 8211
Location: Salford, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you for the bug report. I have logged this for investigation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mecej4
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1899
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
John: Thanks for testing, and for the F77 version.
| JohnCampbell wrote: |
Where did you get this code from ? What would happen if N is not a multiple of 4 ?
|
During the last few months, I replaced an older laptop with a new desktop PC, and thought of exploiting its power to uncover bugs that I suspected to be present in FTN95's code generation and optimisation, particularly for F95 language features. I wanted to use medium size (< 100K lines) packages that came with test examples and known results.
This particular example code came into being as follows. I took the PNED code from http://www.cs.cas.cz/luksan/subroutines.html and translated the code from F77 to F90 using VAST79. For some of the test problems, the F77 and F90 versions did not give the same results. I pruned the F90 code to obtain the example code above (TNEDU test, case NEXT = 3). The PNED example had N=1000; I reduced N to 16 to enable checking with pencil and paper, and ended up with the example code.
VAST79 produced code with syntax errors in this case, but I was able to correct those with the help of FTN95.
Yes, N has to be a multiple of 4; the example code serves only to demonstrate the compiler errors.
I found it amusing that in a couple of runs FTN95 aborted with FP divide by zero, when there is no apparent need to do any division at all.
Incidentally, FTN95 7.20 did better at compiling the example than 8.30 did. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mecej4
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1899
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, John Silver. Guided by your feedback, I constructed a shorter example, and this exposes a couple of different bugs in the compiler.
| Code: | program tfu0
implicit none
integer, parameter :: NX = 16
real :: x(NX),f,c,d
integer :: i, n = NX
x = [(1.0, 3.0, -1.0, 0.0, i=1,n/4)]
print 10,x
c = sum ((x(2:n-2:2) - 2.0*x(3:n-1:2))**4)
d = sum ((x(:n-3:2) - x(4:n:2))**4)
F = c + 10.0*d - 10268.0
print 20,c,d,F
10 format ('X = [',16F5.1,']')
20 format('c,d = ',2F10.1,' (expected: 2548.0, 772.0)',/' F = ', &
F10.1,', expected value = 0.0')
End Program tfu0 |
The results from FTN95 V 8.30.279:
| Code: | -default- FP div by zero
/debug FP div by zero, line-12
/check Internal compiler error
/checkmate Access violation, line-12
/64 Incorrect results for c (1500), d (-576), F (-14528)
/64 /debug -ditto-
/64 /check Incorrect results for c (600), d (0), F (-9668)
/64 /checkmate -ditto- |
With the older V 7.20, this program gives correct results except when /opt is chosen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler
Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 8211
Location: Salford, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This bug has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
