forums.silverfrost.com Forum Index forums.silverfrost.com
Welcome to the Silverfrost forums
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Speed comparison of ftn95

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    forums.silverfrost.com Forum Index -> Support
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
guptass



Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:18 am    Post subject: Speed comparison of ftn95 Reply with quote
I found that FTN95 9.0 version (win32) is 2 to 3% slower than its earlier version FTN95 3.4 version(win32). Which version of ftn95 is fastest, I found that version 4.6/4.7 was still very slow and exe file generated was huge. Pl comment.

Shyam Sunder Gupta
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulLaidler
Site Admin


Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 7923
Location: Salford, UK
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:45 am    Post subject: Speed comparison of ftn95 Reply with quote
I do not know of any reason why the run times are significantly different unless you have used different command line options when compiling.

Using /CHECK or /CHECKMATE etc will slow things down and create much larger executables.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    forums.silverfrost.com Forum Index -> Support All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group