View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
John-Silver
Joined: 30 Jul 2013 Posts: 1520 Location: Aerospace Valley
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
what about this NEW FORUM TOPIC I suggested then ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2819 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
John,
How about "New Quick XY Plot Facility %pl" ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7928 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Agustin
The concept of allowing n=0 has been implemented and also the pen styles PS_SOLID etc.. I will upload a new set of DLLs when a different issue has been resolved. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LitusSaxonicum
Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Posts: 2388 Location: Yateley, Hants, UK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul,
Even though I don't use Simpleplot myself, may I express gratitude that you have updated it? I know you used your usual device of saying nothing until you produced the finished product, but regulars on the Forum know that is your style! %pl is a potentially strong selling point of Clearwin+
I also welcome the idea that a %pl window can be created without data. It is a windows norm that users create windows with various parts deactivated rather than have them changing windows layouts on the fly, so the n=0 option fits with that paradigm.
Similarly, when you made data input windows turn into write only when %il limits were the same. Such refinements make Clearwin+ conform more closely to the way the majority of Windows applications work.
I'm assuming that the new %pl works in both 32 and 64 bit mode.
Eddie |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aebolzan
Joined: 06 Jul 2007 Posts: 229 Location: La Plata, Argentina
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes, you are right...and I am in a similar situation you mention....that's why I asked for more curve styles and symbols, but considering the work Paul is having these days with the compiler, I understand that he cannot deviates too much from the timetable Siverfrost has with the 64 compiler. With the 64 compiler Simpleplot is definitively dead, so any improvement with Clearwin plot facilities is more than welcome. The possibility of using %pl from the very beginning of the run where no data is available yet for plotting is, at least for me, a first step in such direction.
P.S. this was a replay to John's comment about "... unless you work in an office which limits the use of colour printing :O) !!! "....... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aebolzan
Joined: 06 Jul 2007 Posts: 229 Location: La Plata, Argentina
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:20 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
DanRRight wrote: | John,
How about "New Quick XY Plot Facility %pl" ? |
I agree with you.....this subject has nothing to do with "fortran modernisation workshop", so I support the idea to move the next comments or replays about the new %pl implementation to a new "Topic"
Agustin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7928 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Continued as a new topic under ClearWin+. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
silicondale
Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 248 Location: Matlock, Derbyshire, UK
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I attended this workshop and found it very useful. It was actually an advanced training course ("workshop" can mean a lot of different things!). Daresbury isn't the easiest place to get to, but it was well attended - by academics. I think I was the only industry representative who attended, and also the only Silverfrost Fortran user.
Some excellent advice on refactoring (=updating) old code, also much on interface data formats NetCDF and HDF5. Unfortunately although these are open-source, you must compile and build your own library.
Also much time on parallelising Fortran code. Not very useful as neither of the main methods discussed (OpenMP and MPI) seems to be available in Silverfrost Fortran.
A host of other subjects covered, in greater or lesser detail. Please contact me off-board for further information about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|