View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DietmarSiepmann
Joined: 03 Jun 2013 Posts: 279
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
John,
the options I used in my latest post come from our 32 bit build environment (except of /64) and worked. So in a first porting approach to 64 bit I did not change any of these options.
For 32 bit compilations I have not found any problems with option /ALT_KINDS
Paul,
good news (concerning the scc and the integer*2 problem). I am looking forward to a first version of scc for 64 bit.
Regards,
Dietmar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2815 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul,
Will i be able to use third-party 32bit LIB files with 64bit code in the places where more then 2GB is not needed? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7924 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dan
No, that would not work. Also it is unlikely that you will be able to use third party 64 bit static lib files, at least not at the moment.
If you need to use a third party compiler, then you will probably need to create a 64 bit DLL. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnCampbell
Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 2554 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paul,
Is it possible to post an example of building and loading/using a .dll with slink64, say with three .f95 files. (an example with SLINK also would be good)
Would there be any change if one of the .f95 files also had a module ?
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7924 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | slink /dll /exportall file1.obj file2.obj file3.obj /file:mylib.dll
slink64 file1.obj file2.obj file3.obj /file mylib.dll |
You can use modules but module data is only local to its own DLL or executable. Data can not be shared. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DietmarSiepmann
Joined: 03 Jun 2013 Posts: 279
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Paul,
in a post of mine as of 2nd November 2015 I addressed an integer*2 problem which you told me about that it had been fixed.
Now I wonder how I would get hold of this fix. Is it a part of the Beta version addressed by the link
http://www.ftn95.co.uk/ftn95/ftn95-8.00beta/FTN95_Update_Beta.2.exe
?
Regards,
Dietmar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7924 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dietmar
It will be in any beta released after that date.
I understand that a beta 3 is about to be released. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mecej4
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 1886
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:30 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
On Fri Oct 30, 2015,
PaulLaidler wrote: |
I was hoping that a DOS command like COPY would do the trick but I have tried COPY and it does not work for me. |
I do not know what you exactly did, but for using the CMD.EXE COPY command with non-text files you must use the /B option. Otherwise, each file will be truncated at the first CTRL+Z (0x1A) byte (a gift to us that originated in VMS and CPM). I cannot verify this comment/suggestion because the beta release has not been made generally available. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7924 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will have used /B. The 64 bit beta is available on request provided that you have a support licence. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2815 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
In what state F64 is right now? "When i'm 64" ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
silverfrost Site Admin
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 191 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
When are you 64?
We are hoping the 64-bit compiler will be quite soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
silverfrost Site Admin
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 191 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
When are you 64?
We are hoping the 64-bit compiler will be quite soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2815 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it will take some time to me to reach 64
I count months from the point i expected it to be ready a year ago.
Every month of delay for me like an extra tooth pain
Will the 64 bit debugger work with it too? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2815 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it will take some time to me to reach 64
I count months from the point i expected it to be ready a year ago.
Every month of delay for me like an extra tooth pain
Will the 64 bit debugger work with it too? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
silverfrost Site Admin
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 191 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is a 64-bit debugger (a beta one I must add). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|