View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2025 2:25 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
After setting screen size to 200 in win11, getting an error in sdbg as follows:
%TY must immediately follow %Tx
after quitting with trace, get
"for comprehensive error report, must have a FTN95 license
from Silver Frost " ????
Help, Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2025 2:03 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Note: Has anybody seen this message and please respond, Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Sid
I can't get that happen, I have Win 11 24H2 with a high-resolution screen set to 200% (which, incidentally, is a big improvement on the 175% it was set to so I might keep it like that). sdbg is working okay for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:09 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Still getting this error, would it possibly be eliminated by downloading the latest version of Silverfrost Fortran and what site has it? Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 2:40 am Post subject: Display |
|
|
Downloaded and installed the latest version of Silverfrost Fortran. Re-compiled my program again and re-built. When I tried to execute sdbg, got the same error shown, has to do with ClearWin+ as this is what is displayed as the source command? Really confused as to why I am getting this error and no one else is. I do not have any commands that say "ClearWin+" so not sure where it is coming from. Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2025 2:11 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Not sure that I am downloading the latest copy of Silverfrost Fortran, still getting this error from Clearwin+ Not sure if it is a windows error or Silverfrost, any help here? Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2025 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you sure the correct salflibc.dll is available to sdbg? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 2:24 am Post subject: Display |
|
|
Hi Robert, not sure what correct version of salflibc.dll is nor where it would be. When I downloaded the Silverfrost fortran I assumed that it would be downloaded with the silverfrost fortran fiiles, how can I confirm and where would I locate the correct version of Silverfrost fortran to replace what I have? Sid kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Check that the sdbg.exe and salflibc.dll are about the same age and in the same folder.
If you change your screen to be 100% -- does the problem go away? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 2:07 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Yes., when resolution 175% or 100% ok, only get error when resolution > 175% |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robert

Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 457 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2025 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have tried mine up to 250% (and 225%) and it works without an issue. I am not sure what to suggest. Is sdbg64 the same? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2025 10:01 pm Post subject: Display |
|
|
Robert: This is definitely a ClearWin+ error, not sure how to fix. Have tried compiling with the 64 bit code and the Win32 code, still getting the error when I have the display resolution set greater than 175, very confused. Sid Kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stfark1
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:02 am Post subject: Display |
|
|
Interesting: I only get this error on my laptop computer as it allows greater than 175 resolution. However, on my desk top computer it only allows a mx of 175 resolution? Sid kraft |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|