| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wahorger
Joined: 13 Oct 2014
Posts: 1217
Location: Morrison, CO, USA
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:12 pm Post subject: Forcing a traceback |
 |
|
RE: SCC /64 routines: Is there a method by which an error can be communicated that then will result in a callback trace being performed?
The 64-bit compilation of this code (coordinate transforms) does not operate like the 32-bit. It might be that it was not written in a "safe" manner (re: pointers) and is not working. I need to identify the path withing the code to see what is perhaps not coded correctly, and having a method by which the traceback can be performed would be helpful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PaulLaidler
Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 7925
Location: Salford, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you insert the following line of code then a break point will be generated at that point...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wahorger
Joined: 13 Oct 2014
Posts: 1217
Location: Morrison, CO, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Awesome!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wahorger
Joined: 13 Oct 2014
Posts: 1217
Location: Morrison, CO, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I compile, I get:
| Code: | 0089 asm {int 3; }
*** Error 79: 'asm' has not been declared
1 ERRORS [<PJ_PARAM> SCC/WIN32 Ver 4.61]
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wahorger
Joined: 13 Oct 2014
Posts: 1217
Location: Morrison, CO, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Discovered the problem. I am using /ANSI_C as an option and it does not like this construct! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
