View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 8017 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am not familiar with CMAKE so I don't know how much work would be involved on our part.
If there are a number of members of our support community that endorse your request then we could at least do a pilot study to estimate how many man hours of work would be involved. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Robert
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 450 Location: Manchester
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2866 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John,
I by chance found 20 PLPLOT Fortran examples made in 2004 for FTN95 in my folder and suggest you if you want PLPLOT to be broadly accepted just cosmetically touch them to look more modern. Currently these demos look terrible so every time I see them I want to immediately forget them despite they could be probably very useful. They are the best example of anti-advertisement. May be Absoft has better demos as they recommend PLPLOT, as Steve Jobs would fire the guy who made them next day unless he is color blind
After that may be Silverfrost will consider making analog of %pl for each type of plot by making them compatible with %gr and %og. That will be awesome |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|