View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mecej4
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 1886
|
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 9:47 pm Post subject: Access violation during list directed input with repeat coun |
|
|
The program
Code: | program repcnt
implicit none
logical :: b1,b2,b3,b4,b5,b6
character(len=9) :: line = ' 4*T 2*F '
!
read(line,*)b1,b2,b3,b4,b5,b6
print '(1x,6L3)',b1,b2,b3,b4,b5,b6
end program repcnt |
works fine with FTN95 V 8.3 in 32-bit mode. With /64, an access violation occurs in CLEARWIN64.dll. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7923 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks mecej4. I will make a note of this failure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7923 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This has now been fixed for the next release of clearwin64.dll. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John-Silver
Joined: 30 Jul 2013 Posts: 1520 Location: Aerospace Valley
|
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
why does the error, whatever it is, cause an error in/require a correction to a Clearwin dll when there is no Clearwin code in the test program ? _________________ ''Computers (HAL and MARVIN excepted) are incredibly rigid. They question nothing. Especially input data.Human beings are incredibly trusting of computers and don't check input data. Together cocking up even the simplest calculation ... " |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7923 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
The name of the DLL clearwin64.dll has become a misnomer (for FTN95 but not for third party compilers).
Initially it contained only the ClearWin+ library and was targeted at third party compilers.
Now that we have 64 bit FTN95, clearwin64.dll also contains most of the FTN95 library and in particular the FTN95 I/O library.
Why not put the FTN95 library in salflibc64.dll? Because the 64 bit SCC compiler (used to build this DLL) is not yet fully developed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John-Silver
Joined: 30 Jul 2013 Posts: 1520 Location: Aerospace Valley
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for the clear explanation Paul. _________________ ''Computers (HAL and MARVIN excepted) are incredibly rigid. They question nothing. Especially input data.Human beings are incredibly trusting of computers and don't check input data. Together cocking up even the simplest calculation ... " |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|