View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DanRRight
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 2815 Location: South Pole, Antarctica
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:10 am Post subject: DRAW_LINE@ and DRAW_TEXT@ |
|
|
Paul
Any reasons why simple and clear DRAW_LINE@ and DRAW_TEXT@ were substituted (not supported in 64bits) with longer names DRAW_LINE_BETWEEN@ and DRAW_CHARACTERS@ ?
They do the same things. How about just to support both like alias of each other? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7924 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dan
These are very old DBOS names. They are hard-wired into salflibc.dll. Since they are old and there lots of them, they are not provided as aliases in clearwin64.dll.
If you prefer to continue using these old names then you should add the line
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John-Silver
Joined: 30 Jul 2013 Posts: 1520 Location: Aerospace Valley
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
that needs adding to the 64 bit release notes documentation before it gets lost.
In fact it would be a great idea to produce a document 'how to convert a 32 bit ftn95 program to 64 bit article on the website which could be added to when things like this crop up.
Similar to the many articles I've seen ont' net which treat conversion of F77 progs to F90/95. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7924 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
John
This information is already in the document noteson64bitftn95.txt and also in ftn95.chm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|