View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
guptass
Joined: 08 Feb 2006 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:18 am Post subject: Speed comparison of ftn95 |
|
|
I found that FTN95 9.0 version (win32) is 2 to 3% slower than its earlier version FTN95 3.4 version(win32). Which version of ftn95 is fastest, I found that version 4.6/4.7 was still very slow and exe file generated was huge. Pl comment.
Shyam Sunder Gupta |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulLaidler Site Admin
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 7924 Location: Salford, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:45 am Post subject: Speed comparison of ftn95 |
|
|
I do not know of any reason why the run times are significantly different unless you have used different command line options when compiling.
Using /CHECK or /CHECKMATE etc will slow things down and create much larger executables.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|