Author |
Message |
Topic: Array Section Bug |
sigment
Replies: 1
Views: 1748
|
Forum: Support Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2024 6:49 am Subject: Array Section Bug |
This demo won't compile with the array assignment line and without it the SHAPE of the section is wrong.
program section
real(8) :: A(3,2) = 42D0, C(2,2) = 0D0
pri ... |
Topic: Optimization bug with CYCLE |
sigment
Replies: 4
Views: 5801
|
Forum: Support Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:51 pm Subject: Optimization bug with CYCLE |
Hi,
The program below gives different results with /OPTIMISE but shouldn't.
I am running FTN95 5.21. This is a very serious bug that will break a lot of code.
PROGRAM CYCLE_BUG
... |
Topic: Runtime error with array-valued function |
sigment
Replies: 1
Views: 3936
|
Forum: Support Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:48 pm Subject: Runtime error with array-valued function |
The program below, using an array-valued function, gives runtime errors with FTN95 5.20.1 and 5.21.0 no matter what options I use but works with my other compilers and I believe it is well-formed. Wit ... |
Topic: Stack overflow with /CHECKMATE |
sigment
Replies: 7
Views: 8418
|
Forum: Support Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:35 am Subject: |
Well I spoke too soon. After making a few minor changes to the app the stack overflow is back, despite using -vc with slink and no matter how large I make the stack.
I wanted to purchase a FTN95 li ... |
Topic: Stack overflow with /CHECKMATE |
sigment
Replies: 7
Views: 8418
|
Forum: Support Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:07 pm Subject: |
Thanks Paul. With -VC it now runs with /CHECKMATE and /FULL_DEBUG with modest memory use! I'll give it a workout next week and see how it does.
Thanks for all the help. |
Topic: Stack overflow with /CHECKMATE |
sigment
Replies: 7
Views: 8418
|
Forum: Support Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:01 am Subject: |
Thanks, but it seems as though virtual common wouldn't be compatible with /CHECKMATE since I assume you have to initialize all COMMON variables in order to detect use of them when uninitialized. And m ... |
Topic: Stack overflow with /CHECKMATE |
sigment
Replies: 7
Views: 8418
|
Forum: Support Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:32 pm Subject: |
Paul, thanks for the quick response. Right now /SAVE is required but I agree that using explicit SAVE declarations in the code is preferred and I plan to migrate the code to that over time (I didn't a ... |
Topic: Stack overflow with /CHECKMATE |
sigment
Replies: 7
Views: 8418
|
Forum: Support Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:10 am Subject: Stack overflow with /CHECKMATE |
Hi,
I'm trying to see if I can use the great-sounding FTN95 /CHECKMATE dynamic testing support with a mid-size (55K LOC) legacy Fortran 77 application but with no luck so far. No matter how large I ... |
Topic: Problem Report: Access Violation during compile |
sigment
Replies: 3
Views: 5399
|
Forum: Support Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:35 pm Subject: |
Cool. Thanks. That was fast!
Any hint as to when the next release is due out?
S. |
Topic: Problem Report: Access Violation during compile |
sigment
Replies: 3
Views: 5399
|
Forum: Support Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:43 pm Subject: Problem Report: Access Violation during compile |
Hi,
Here's a small program that demonstrates an access violation bug in FTN95 5.10.0 and the work-around:
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-H,O-Z)
! DOUBLE PRECISION EXPCHK ! OK if this ... |
|