Author |
Message |
Topic: Interface bug? |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 2
Views: 4073
|
Forum: Support Posted: Wed May 14, 2025 6:24 pm Subject: |
This failure has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95. |
Topic: Formatting equations |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 11
Views: 14047
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Wed May 14, 2025 11:08 am Subject: |
A new option %eq[local_font] has been added and some improvements to the display for %eq have been made for the next release of ClearWin+.
%eq[local_font] will use the current %fn and %ts instead o ... |
Topic: Issue with %pl 32 bit |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 2
Views: 4891
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Mon May 12, 2025 7:51 am Subject: |
This failure has now been fixed for the next release of the DLLs.
In the mean time the failure can be avoided by increasing the value for y_sigfigs. |
Topic: Puzzle asin(z) and acos(z) |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 15
Views: 70538
|
Forum: General Posted: Fri May 09, 2025 8:21 am Subject: |
Many thanks for this valuable analysis.
I have implemented Ken's method in the Win32/x64 FTN95 library for the next release. |
Topic: MOVE_ALLOC - error 984 |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 5
Views: 13849
|
Forum: Support Posted: Thu May 08, 2025 10:40 am Subject: |
When using the current developers' version of FTN95 this code fails because of the presence of MOVE_ALLOC even though MOVE_ALLOC is not called.
Pending further investigation, the use of MOVE_ALLOC ... |
Topic: Array constructor issue |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 5
Views: 9544
|
Forum: Support Posted: Wed May 07, 2025 11:25 am Subject: |
This failure has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95. |
Topic: error 474 - Invalid expression in array constructor |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 2
Views: 10204
|
Forum: Support Posted: Mon May 05, 2025 1:06 pm Subject: |
This failure has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95. |
Topic: Allocate on assignment |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 1
Views: 1587
|
Forum: General Posted: Mon May 05, 2025 7:20 am Subject: Allocate on assignment |
The next release will include a new FTN95 command line option /ALLOW_AOA. This will activate the Fortran 2003 feature that permits the assignment of an ALLOCATABLE object without a prior ALLOCATE. By ... |
Topic: setMaxLines |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 2
Views: 7036
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:58 am Subject: |
I don't have any insights on this but it is worth noting that you can learn a lot by running the application from the debugger. Even though it is using ClearWin+ you can still set multiple break point ... |
Topic: Bug %pl / change_plot_chr@ /64 bit |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 4
Views: 4641
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2025 8:48 am Subject: |
This failure has now been fixed for the next release of the ClearWin+ library. |
Topic: Bug %pl / change_plot_chr@ /64 bit |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 4
Views: 4641
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2025 7:12 am Subject: |
Ken
Thank you for the feedback. I have made a note that this needs investigating. |
Topic: IOSTAT error 146 |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 15
Views: 20994
|
Forum: Support Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2025 6:42 am Subject: |
If this relates to the Fortran OPEN statement then I doubt that anything can be done in the compiler IO library to fix this.
Maybe there will be a different way for the user to get the file name an ... |
Topic: Operator |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 1
Views: 2920
|
Forum: Support Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 7:34 am Subject: |
Simon
Thank you for the feedback. This failure has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95. |
Topic: Invalid Floating Point Number exception |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 4
Views: 4953
|
Forum: Support Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2025 7:14 am Subject: |
One possibility is to use the IEE_ARITHMETIC module and a call to
x = ieee_value(x,IEEE_QUIET_NAN)
Using x might give the desired result.
Otherwise the TRANSFER function can be used ... |
Topic: Windows 11? |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 8
Views: 34778
|
Forum: General Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 4:54 pm Subject: |
KL
Please see http://forums.silverfrost.com/viewtopic.php?t=5045.
The latest release of FTN95 for supported users is v9.10. In this release Win32 underflows are masked by default which means tha ... |
|