Author |
Message |
Topic: Bug with 32 bit compiler |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 5
Views: 401
|
Forum: Support Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2024 8:10 am Subject: |
Many thanks (Ken) for the bug report and (John) for the investigation. This has now been fixed for the next release of FTN95. |
Topic: Puzzle |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 4
Views: 2061
|
Forum: General Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:21 pm Subject: |
Ken
If "implicit none" is added to the main program, FTN95 ought to fault the use of the variables a and dp.
It fails in this respect and I will note this as a bug that needs fixing. |
Topic: Confusing difference |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 10
Views: 2242
|
Forum: Support Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 9:15 am Subject: |
64 bit applications can in theory access the the x87 FPU coprocessor which has 80 bit floating point precision. This coprocessor is separate from the the CPU that uses SSE etc. instructions and which ... |
Topic: Edit Cells (%lv) |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 3
Views: 2628
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 4:38 pm Subject: |
This omission has now been fixed for the next release of the DLLs. |
Topic: Confusing difference |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 10
Views: 2242
|
Forum: Support Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 1:05 pm Subject: |
64 bit executables are not generally the answer to issues relating to floating point precision.
For example 32 bit FTN95 provides for 80 bit floating point values as well as 32 and 64. Most Fortran ... |
Topic: Confusing difference |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 10
Views: 2242
|
Forum: Support Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:59 am Subject: |
For maximum precision you can use real*10 with Win32 rather than x64.
options(alt_kinds)
program main
real*10 :: a,b,c,d
logical :: f1, f2
a = 1.0_10/3.0_10
b = 2.0_10/ ... |
Topic: TIOBE index top 20: re-emergence of Fortran |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 24
Views: 18235
|
Forum: General Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:11 am Subject: |
Dan
I don't have Linux installed but I will take a look at EPOCH when I can.
John
I will aim to add LOCAL etc. so that FTN95 will not raise an error condition when these attributes are added ... |
Topic: TIOBE index top 20: re-emergence of Fortran |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 24
Views: 18235
|
Forum: General Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 8:21 am Subject: |
Dan
If you are aready doing parallel processing but not with FTN95 perhaps you would send me the project so that I can get an idea of what you are asking for.
In the mean time FTN95 with ClearWi ... |
Topic: TIOBE index top 20: re-emergence of Fortran |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 24
Views: 18235
|
Forum: General Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2024 7:34 am Subject: |
There are various ways in which we (Silverfrost) can deploy our resources:
1) Bug fixing.
2) Implementing new features in the Fortran Standards.
3) Implementing on operating systems other than Wi ... |
Topic: G0 format specifier |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 3
Views: 2791
|
Forum: Suggestions Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 11:42 am Subject: |
This has now been added for the next release of FTN95 and the DLLs. |
Topic: Birth defect of Clearwin |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 10
Views: 2465
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2024 10:57 am Subject: |
program main
real*8 a,b,c
a = 0.0d0
b = 0.0d0
c = 0.0d0
iw = winio@("%co[check_on_focus_loss]&")
iw = winio@("%nlA: %rf[fmt=7.2g]&", a ... |
Topic: Why this is forbidden ? |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 5
Views: 1615
|
Forum: General Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2024 10:41 am Subject: |
I have had a look at this code and FTN95 appears to be conforming to the Standard in this case. |
Topic: G0 format specifier |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 3
Views: 2791
|
Forum: Suggestions Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2024 10:22 am Subject: |
Kenneth
Thank you for the suggestion. I have added this to the list. |
Topic: Array Section Bug |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 1
Views: 1410
|
Forum: Support Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2024 10:17 am Subject: |
sigment
Thank you for the bug report. I have logged this as needing fixing. |
Topic: Birth defect of Clearwin |
PaulLaidler
Replies: 10
Views: 2465
|
Forum: ClearWin+ Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:43 am Subject: |
In general when a user types in a fp number it will contain digits, possible full stop, signs and E or e. Only when they have finished can ClearWin+ read and then present the number in the requested f ... |
|