Author |
Message |
Topic: SDBG64: Can not cancel previously set breakpoint on variable |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 21
Views: 21278
|
Forum: Support Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 9:35 am Subject: |
Paul,
thanks for your information. I did know this request but that was not my problem.
In the request you mentioned in your last post there appeared 2 ways of retrieving information about the S ... |
Topic: SDBG64: Can not cancel previously set breakpoint on variable |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 21
Views: 21278
|
Forum: Support Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 4:28 pm Subject: |
I would like to make use of routines
C_EXTERNAL GetLibraryVersionInfo '_GetLibraryVersionInfo'():INTEGER(7)
C_EXTERNAL GetLibraryDateInfo '_GetLibraryDateInfo'():INTE ... |
Topic: Couple issues with SDBG64 |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 33
Views: 41393
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Tue May 25, 2021 9:22 am Subject: |
For ftn95 version 7.10 after pressing F6 in the debug session with sdbg after some time a dialog window (with titlebar "Waiting" ) is displayed. This dialog window contains a push button wit ... |
Topic: Couple issues with SDBG64 |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 33
Views: 41393
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 1:57 pm Subject: |
In my environment the look and feel and functionality of the debugger is different with respect to the compiler version and the property, if generating a 32 bit or a 64 bit version.
1. ftn95 versio ... |
Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation? |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 22
Views: 30362
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 1:52 pm Subject: |
Sorry,
I apologize, I probably used the wrong naming "resource manager" in my last posts. What I meant was the Windows tool displaying the dlls of an executable specified. This should hav ... |
Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation? |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 22
Views: 30362
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 1:14 pm Subject: |
Paul,
the menu selection described works if the sdbg64 main window is not maximized. In this case a window with titlebar "Silverfrost Debugger" is displayed showing version info and copyr ... |
Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation? |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 22
Views: 30362
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 11:33 am Subject: |
Paul,
I'm afraid I need to correct my last post with respect to the following:
if I start the debugging session via command
sdbg64 test.EXE
and then select
Help
Abo ... |
Topic: MK32 does not work for the below simple example. |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 8
Views: 6436
|
Forum: Support Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 2:25 pm Subject: |
Shahram,
the online help (started via ftn95 --help) says if navigating to
--> ftn95 --> MK32 --> Reference --> Rules
A line in a makefile that starts with a TAB or SPACE is a rule.
... |
Topic: slink64 does not know heap command |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 16
Views: 48490
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Fri May 14, 2021 4:09 pm Subject: |
Dan,
I'm afraid I need to express objections concerning some of your statements, e.g.
Kill and burn 32 bits
Silverfrost has to suggest all to switch to 64bits.
and 32bits should be pronounced d ... |
Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation? |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 22
Views: 30362
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Tue May 11, 2021 11:46 am Subject: |
Paul,
I have downloaded all the new stuff from the Support sticky web site including clrwin.ins.
Now sdbg64 works for test.exe as expected
Thanks and regards,
Dietmar |
Topic: MK32 does not work for the below simple example. |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 8
Views: 6436
|
Forum: Support Posted: Tue May 04, 2021 5:19 pm Subject: |
Shahram,
your makefile needs TABS in oder to work at the beginning of your command lines:
ftn95 $< /check
SLINK prog.lnk
Command mk32 -n
shows what would be done (no execution). For I ... |
Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation? |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 22
Views: 30362
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 4:15 pm Subject: |
Paul,
having competeley upgraded to version 8.72 (debuggers, dlls, ftn95, clearwin+, slink64) via the support "sticky" post I ran into problems with sdbg64 when debugging test.exe. Test.e ... |
Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation? |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 22
Views: 30362
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 12:50 pm Subject: |
Paul,
thanks, with this new version the 64 bit vesion of test.exe presets common block data to zero analogously to the 32 bit version
Regards,
Dietmar |
Topic: Different result in 64-bit application |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 15
Views: 27412
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 10:45 am Subject: |
Bill, John, Paul,
I would like to comment your very interesting comments.
I learnt ALGOL W in 1974 (approximately) and then changed to ALGOL 60 when implementing algorithms in numerical analysis ... |
Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation? |
DietmarSiepmann
Replies: 22
Views: 30362
|
Forum: 64-bit Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 9:24 am Subject: |
Paul, John C,
thanks again for your informations.
The /SAVE option seems to be very complicated and to me it seems that one cannot rely on COMMON BLOCK VARIABLEs to be set to zero if /SAVE is sp ... |
|