forums.silverfrost.com Forum Index forums.silverfrost.com
Welcome to the Silverfrost forums
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Search found 279 matches
forums.silverfrost.com Forum Index
Author Message
  Topic: SDBG64: Can not cancel previously set breakpoint on variable
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 21
Views: 17682

PostForum: Support   Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 9:35 am   Subject:
Paul,

thanks for your information. I did know this request but that was not my problem.

In the request you mentioned in your last post there appeared 2 ways of retrieving information about the S ...
  Topic: SDBG64: Can not cancel previously set breakpoint on variable
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 21
Views: 17682

PostForum: Support   Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 4:28 pm   Subject:
I would like to make use of routines
C_EXTERNAL GetLibraryVersionInfo '_GetLibraryVersionInfo'():INTEGER(7)
C_EXTERNAL GetLibraryDateInfo '_GetLibraryDateInfo'():INTE ...
  Topic: Couple issues with SDBG64
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 33
Views: 35181

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Tue May 25, 2021 9:22 am   Subject:
For ftn95 version 7.10 after pressing F6 in the debug session with sdbg after some time a dialog window (with titlebar "Waiting" ) is displayed. This dialog window contains a push button wit ...
  Topic: Couple issues with SDBG64
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 33
Views: 35181

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 1:57 pm   Subject:
In my environment the look and feel and functionality of the debugger is different with respect to the compiler version and the property, if generating a 32 bit or a 64 bit version.

1. ftn95 versio ...
  Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation?
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 22
Views: 25005

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 1:52 pm   Subject:
Sorry,

I apologize, I probably used the wrong naming "resource manager" in my last posts. What I meant was the Windows tool displaying the dlls of an executable specified. This should hav ...
  Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation?
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 22
Views: 25005

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 1:14 pm   Subject:
Paul,

the menu selection described works if the sdbg64 main window is not maximized. In this case a window with titlebar "Silverfrost Debugger" is displayed showing version info and copyr ...
  Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation?
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 22
Views: 25005

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 11:33 am   Subject:
Paul,

I'm afraid I need to correct my last post with respect to the following:

if I start the debugging session via command

sdbg64 test.EXE
and then select

Help
Abo ...
  Topic: MK32 does not work for the below simple example.
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 8
Views: 4831

PostForum: Support   Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 2:25 pm   Subject:
Shahram,

the online help (started via ftn95 --help) says if navigating to
--> ftn95 --> MK32 --> Reference --> Rules

A line in a makefile that starts with a TAB or SPACE is a rule. ...
  Topic: slink64 does not know heap command
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 16
Views: 26743

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Fri May 14, 2021 4:09 pm   Subject:
Dan,

I'm afraid I need to express objections concerning some of your statements, e.g.
Kill and burn 32 bits
Silverfrost has to suggest all to switch to 64bits.
and 32bits should be pronounced d ...
  Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation?
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 22
Views: 25005

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Tue May 11, 2021 11:46 am   Subject:
Paul,

I have downloaded all the new stuff from the Support sticky web site including clrwin.ins.

Now sdbg64 works for test.exe as expected Smile

Thanks and regards,
Dietmar
  Topic: MK32 does not work for the below simple example.
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 8
Views: 4831

PostForum: Support   Posted: Tue May 04, 2021 5:19 pm   Subject:
Shahram,

your makefile needs TABS in oder to work at the beginning of your command lines:

ftn95 $< /check
SLINK prog.lnk


Command mk32 -n
shows what would be done (no execution). For I ...
  Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation?
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 22
Views: 25005

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 4:15 pm   Subject:
Paul,

having competeley upgraded to version 8.72 (debuggers, dlls, ftn95, clearwin+, slink64) via the support "sticky" post I ran into problems with sdbg64 when debugging test.exe. Test.e ...
  Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation?
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 22
Views: 25005

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 12:50 pm   Subject:
Paul,

thanks, with this new version the 64 bit vesion of test.exe presets common block data to zero analogously to the 32 bit version Smile

Regards,
Dietmar
  Topic: Different result in 64-bit application
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 15
Views: 23223

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 10:45 am   Subject:
Bill, John, Paul,

I would like to comment your very interesting comments.

I learnt ALGOL W in 1974 (approximately) and then changed to ALGOL 60 when implementing algorithms in numerical analysis ...
  Topic: Strange behaviour in common block initialisation?
DietmarSiepmann

Replies: 22
Views: 25005

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 9:24 am   Subject:
Paul, John C,

thanks again for your informations.

The /SAVE option seems to be very complicated and to me it seems that one cannot rely on COMMON BLOCK VARIABLEs to be set to zero if /SAVE is sp ...
 
Page 1 of 19 Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group