forums.silverfrost.com Forum Index forums.silverfrost.com
Welcome to the Silverfrost forums
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Search found 1997 matches
forums.silverfrost.com Forum Index
Author Message
  Topic: Configuring SLINK64
DanRRight

Replies: 2
Views: 185

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 12:24 pm   Subject: Re: Configuring SLINK64
My tests so far seem to show no degradation when an unnecessarily large reserve stack size is used.

I am still confused how it works as i always was since 32bit. For example i can compile and run p ...
  Topic: Access violation error in 64-bit; works in 32-bit
DanRRight

Replies: 26
Views: 637

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:58 am   Subject:
But does it help? When i add SAVE to the code above i get this.

https://i.postimg.cc/8zLFtdVx/Image25.jpg
  Topic: Error in CHECKMATE but not in RELEASE
DanRRight

Replies: 6
Views: 177

PostForum: Support   Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:11 pm   Subject:
This demonstrates that Clearwin+ has to work consistently with /checkmate (or /undef) and do the same what the FTN95 is doing : track such variables too. It missed the uninitialized variable. You are ...
  Topic: Access violation error in 64-bit; works in 32-bit
DanRRight

Replies: 26
Views: 637

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:07 pm   Subject:
Paul,
By the way the demo example above with SAVE did not increase EXE size. But major question is why /stack:3000 or larger does not make this demo to work as it should be?
  Topic: Access violation error in 64-bit; works in 32-bit
DanRRight

Replies: 26
Views: 637

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 7:39 pm   Subject:
Paul,
By the way the demo example above with SAVE did not increase EXE size. But major question is why /stack:3000 or larger does not make this demo to work as it should be?
  Topic: Error in CHECKMATE but not in RELEASE
DanRRight

Replies: 6
Views: 177

PostForum: Support   Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:21 am   Subject:
Have no problem compiling. I'm lost which DLL version i have but this handy program (recommend to all to add to all your codes. Who was its author here?) tells that my
Library date is 4:53:46 - 27: ...
  Topic: Access violation error in 64-bit; works in 32-bit
DanRRight

Replies: 26
Views: 637

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 9:37 am   Subject:
One positive moment i found playing with this demo and my own programs which were causing stack overflow in 64bits. Though /stack:2048 had not solve the problem of this original poster, it positively ...
  Topic: Access violation error in 64-bit; works in 32-bit
DanRRight

Replies: 26
Views: 637

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 9:09 am   Subject: Re:
Dan, what is a terabyte of random numbers ?
John, Who knows what for this code was written. May be this is just a demo. Or author is writing safe media eraser permanently generating random numbers ...
  Topic: Access violation error in 64-bit; works in 32-bit
DanRRight

Replies: 26
Views: 637

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:43 am   Subject:
Yes, array is bit larger than 2GB. Does not matter, the /stack is set to ~2GB maximum like it was maximum possible with 32bit system (up to 3+ GB with /3GB ) after which it does not work. It is impo ...
  Topic: Access violation error in 64-bit; works in 32-bit
DanRRight

Replies: 26
Views: 637

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 1:49 am   Subject:
The code is just 180 * 1700 *1000 * 4 = 1,224,000,000 bytes or only ~1GB in size. Compiling it

ftn95 aaa.for /full_debug /64 >z
slink64 aaa.obj /stack:2064 >zz
sdbg64 aaa.exe


wi ...
  Topic: Voice of doom: Stack overflow in 64bit
DanRRight

Replies: 21
Views: 805

PostForum: 64-bit   Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 12:36 pm   Subject:
Paul,

Are the size in 32bit and 64bit when you do /stack=size measured differently?
For sure the size in 32bits is in KBs but you are saying in 64bits it is in MBs?

Do i correctly understand t ...
  Topic: Missing graphics_write_mode@ in 64
DanRRight

Replies: 2
Views: 142

PostForum: ClearWin+   Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 12:22 pm   Subject:
Thanks
  Topic: Missing graphics_write_mode@ in 64
DanRRight

Replies: 2
Views: 142

PostForum: ClearWin+   Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 8:07 pm   Subject: Missing graphics_write_mode@ in 64
Found one function which is still missing with /64 : graphics_write_mode@.
  Topic: Not Clear diagnostics
DanRRight

Replies: 66
Views: 2315

PostForum: ClearWin+   Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:12 pm   Subject:
Of course from now the "non-writable expression" (NWE)will be a one of the laughable slogans for Fortran diagnostics. Even the best diagnostics compiler like FTN95 fell short of being reason ...
  Topic: Not Clear diagnostics
DanRRight

Replies: 66
Views: 2315

PostForum: ClearWin+   Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2019 5:02 am   Subject:
I exterminated other compilers from my harddrives and CD collections a decade(s) ago. Do not afraid to show what other compiler diagnostics says to the user, you may do that anonymously Compiler 1, Co ...
 
Page 1 of 134 Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 132, 133, 134  Next
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group